Parochialism and Pluralism in Cyberspace Regulation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Internet, Legal Regulation and Legal Pluralism
Considerable academic effort is being expended in considering how to regulate various activities on the internet, particularly those as relate to obscene material, breaches of privacy and challenges to intellectual property rights. Post and Johnson (1997) offer the following solution which is typical; 'We believe that the most obvious answer to this question -existing territorial sovereigns -ma...
متن کاملApproval Voting and Parochialism
In hypothetical scenarios involving two groups (nations or groups of workers), subjects voted on three proposals: one helped group A (their group), one helped B, and one helped both groups, more than the average of the first two but less than their maximum. When subjects voted for one proposal, most voted for the one that helped group A. This result is “parochial” because it helps the voter’s o...
متن کاملMethodological pluralism and pluralism of method
The only uses of this work permitted are private study or research.
متن کاملFraming Assumptions and Cyberspace Regulation: A Critical Reflection on Differences among Countries
Thispaper attempts to connect two rather different fields of study by applying concepts from regulating technological risks to the field of cyberspace regulation. The concept of framing assumption is used in order to show the cyberspace regulation differences in countries particularly between the U.S. and the Euopean system. It shows how the U.S. and Europe have adopted different assumptions r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: University of Pennsylvania Law Review
سال: 2005
ISSN: 0041-9907
DOI: 10.2307/4150655